Thursday, January 20, 2005
Firefox adoption rockets in January; good or bad for Google and Yahoo?
Analytics firm WebSideStory reported (story via CRN) that as of January 14th, Firefox has 5% of the Web brower market, a full 1 percentage point higher than in early December. Firefox's adoption rate in the U.S. almost tripled during the last month, and as a result Microsoft's share is now on the cusp of falling through the 90% mark.
Now, it's obvious that the spread of Firefox is negative for Microsoft. But what about Google and Yahoo!? Here's are some points to consider:
Why the spread of Firefox helps Google:
- Google is the default option in the convenient Firefox search window. That means that most people who download the browser will use Google search by default.
Why the spread of Firefox helps Google and Yahoo!:
- I've argued that Microsoft could dominate the search market by building MSN search into a new version of Internet Explorer or a desktop search tool as the only option or the default option. It's therefore critical for Google and Yahoo that Microsoft lose its grip on the browser (or whatever client software is used to initiate searches) market.
Why Google and Yahoo may suffer from Firefox:
- Venture capitalist Steve Hall raises an interesting issue about Firefox. One of the strengths of Firefox is its ease of customization. In particular, it's easy to customize the built-in search function to offer searches of specific e-commerce catalogs, comparison shopping engines and numerous other databases. Hall argues that this could negatively impact Google as users decide to search using other services. (You can view the list of niche search services that Hall has installed on his copy of Firefox here.)
- Firefox (with its extensions) has better ad-blocking technology than IE. With a relatively limited amount of customization, Firefox can be set to block contextual ads from Google and Overture.
Conclusion: net impact of Firefox
- Positive for Google. Most people will use the default search option; and most users (not the tech-savvy early adopters) will not use the ad-blocking or search customization tools. So Google's a net beneficiary.
- Negative for Yahoo!. Most people don't use the default search option in IE, and find it more convenient to go to a Web page to initiate their searches. But Firefox makes it easier to search directly from the browser - and the default search is Google's. So Yahoo! will probably lose market share as Firefox adoption grows. Also, if people do use the ad-blocking extensions for Firefox, that will hit Yahoo's Overture business.
TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference Firefox adoption rockets in January; good or bad for Google and Yahoo?:
Tracked on January 21, 2005 02:05 PM
» New stats on Firefox market share good for Google, bad for Microsoft, less clear for Yahoo! from ReBlog
Janco Associates released its First Quarter 2005 Browser Market Share Study showing that Firefox now has 4.5% market share and Microsoft Internet Explorer's market share has now fallen to 84.9%. But the situation for IE might be worse than that.In... [Read More]
Tracked on February 14, 2005 11:54 PM
Should GOOGs or YHOO think about buying Firefox? If MSFT is going into your arena, why not enter theirs?
Posted by: Big Jake | January 21, 2005 01:58 AM
A side effect that I have found from having Firefox and its imbedded search is that I actually search using many different engines when I used to use only Google. Before I would refine my search by changing keywords but now I just switch engines and try again in a new tab.
Maybe my experience with Firefox is atypical but using it the way I do it transfers power from the search page to the browser and generally ended my loyalty to Google. Around the beginning of the year you had written that MSFT might offer an updated browser with an imbedded search. If they do that then I would say even if users still search Google first MSFT may still come out ahead.
Posted by: Michael | January 21, 2005 09:25 AM
The little search box makes it easy to
"switch" search providers, the cost of trying
another is zero. Not exactly the moat of the
Hershey Bar variety!....disclosure 06 leap puts on GOOG.
Posted by: mj | January 22, 2005 03:00 PM